Bruce

By Elizabeth Bromstein

These millionaires were born after 1982.

Forbes just released its 20 Richest Stars Under 25 list. Yay.
I don't know about you but I can't stand precocious, overly successful young people. Like those 12-year-olds you see on Oprah who started their own businesses and are now little millionaires. They give me hives. Primarily because they are a reminder of my own relative failure.

But, let's amuse ourselves shall we? See if you can put these girls in ranking order!

Avril Lavigne (b. September 27, 1984)
Carrie Underwood (b. March 10, 1983)
Miley Cyrus, a.k.a. Hannah Montana (b. November 23, 1992)
Mandy Moore (b. April 10, 1984)
Lindsay Lohan (b. July 2, 1986)
Hilary Duff (b. September 28, 1987)



Scroll down the page for answers



Answers:
Hilary: $12 million
Avril: $12 million
Carrie: $7 million
Lindsay: $3.5 million
Miley: $3.5 million
Mandy: $3.5 million

>> - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Curb Zone

 

Alx

Dude, i thought Lindsay would have been worth alot more, she better stop her antics!!!

As for Miley Cyrus, she's on her way to toping the list...

I think she has the most potential.

Thanks for posting...

Bruce

You're welcome!

Yeah, I thought Lindsay would have been higher too. And I must admit to being completely suprised by Miley Cyrus' recent success. I didn't even have a clue as to the hell she was (although I had a feeling she was related to the good old "ache-breaky heart" - hate Bill ) until a month ago when she sneaked up on my radar. Now everyone's talking about her...

Choleric

I'd do every one of um, 'cept Cyrus, shes too young.

Bruce

Haha. Nice thinkin' Jeff.

Avril would be my first choice in such regard, followed by Mandy.

450SEL6.9

Haha, Bruce. I don't think all lot of the rich young people are actually overly successful. They are just overpaid. Today, even a celebrity with little to no talent could make $10 million because the world is obsessed with the celebrity lifestyle. You'd be surprised how many blockbuster movies don't make back their investment because the star, A-list actor is so egregiously over compensated!

Entertainers are so rich because the studio bosses that run the entertainment industry are stupid enough to give them everything they want. Miley Cyrus is probably going to be making $50 million in no time, but how much profit will she really be adding to Disney? I own a few Disney through index funds, so I'd like to know myself. If she makes, say, a $70 million net profit for Disney and she gets $50 million herself, I'd call her grossly overpaid.

A star stock trader on Wall St. that makes $70 million profit for his firm would likely get only $4-7 million because Wall St. firms aren't so stupid to give him 5/7ths of what he helped earn. There is still a slow-changing mentality that says if you made $100 million for your Wall St. firm, the second $50 million was a waste of your time because they're not going to pay you more than a certain amount.

Say, Bruce, if you can't stand these precocious, young millionaires, how do you feel about the 23-yr.-old billionaire founder of Facebook?

Bruce

Haha. Ray, I didn't write that. I copied it from the original article; hence the italics.

Interesting post though.

Alfie

Damn, that Cyrus girl is damn you, and damn rich to be that young. I also hadn't heard of her before. Don't watch Disney channel too much:P

Mikael

Where are the anorectic Olsen twins? I would have thought they were quite high on that list.

450SEL6.9

The scary thing is that there are parents out there whose own financial plan in life is for the kids to become mega stars or the next super athlete.

Curb Zone