Curb Zone
 
   
 

Go Back   Curb Zone > Transportation > Cars > European Cars > Mercedes-Benz > The Mercedes-Benz Lounge

The Mercedes-Benz Lounge General discussions about Mercedes-Benz cars. Mercedes-Benz News, Rumors, Opinions, Revelations and Critiques.


Welcome to the Curb Zone.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view and access most features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2006, 10:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
Alx
007
 
Alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -Poconos, PA.- 2005 Aston Martin DB9
Posts: 5,458
My Mood:
Thanks: 886
Thanked 551 Times in 224 Posts
Alx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to behold
Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?



- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER has run a story today apparently based on an interview with Dieter Zetsche, in which they state that Mercedes will soon start offering less options to customers in an effort to boost manufacturing productivity.

In the article, Zetsche was quoted as saying "We will surely continue to offer greater variety than a brand such as Hyundai," but then went on to say that they will reduce overlapping offers, such as two sport options on the same model.

I'm not going to read too much into the story, because the story is based on one direct quote from Dieter, but I am going to use this opportunity to share my view on Mercedes' options.

I hate them. I completely and utterly hate them.

For example, let's look at the 2007 Mercedes S-Class. As you already know, it's a technological wonder: Night View Assist, Distronic PLUS, Active Body Control, all are amazing features Mercedes has implemented in their latest flagship sedan, and all are options not included in the $86,175 price tag.

Then you look at some of the other options. Wood on the steering wheel - $900. Chrome door handle inserts - $79. Trunk handle - $19. Are you kidding me? I'm spending $85,000+ on Mercedes' flagship sedan, and I'm going to be charged $19 for a trunk handle?

Now, let me paint a different picture for you. Imagine you've seen the all-new 2007 S-Class, and you've read about all its amazing features. Then imagine you go to Mercedes' website, and the price you see includes everything you've read about. There's no need to go through and spec your own model, because it's all included with the price. It would be a miracle.

Obviously, there's limitations to this method. An S-Class with every conceivable option would cost well over $100,000, and the sticker shock in and of itself would lead to lost sales. But I'm not asking for every available option to be included, here instead is what I'd like to see:

1. All main options included. If 90% of all customers add a specific option, it should be included in the price. You already know everyone wants it, so why force us to endure watching the S-Class' base price rise with every added option. Spare us the pains, please, and just include them.

2. Stupid options included. Trunk handle, chrome surrounds around the headlights, chrome-plated tire valve stem caps - save us the additional $200, include all of them, and have us specify whether or not we want them with a simple yes/no checklist. Simple.

3. Keep Less Popular Options Optional. Obviously with Mercedes, there will be some options the majority of customers won't want or don't opt for. $700 for power window blinds? I'll pass. Keep these options as options, but as mentioned earlier, if the total cost amounts to $20, do everyone a favor and just include them.


I already know what you're thinking - wouldn't adding certain options drastically increase the base price of the S-Class? My answer: no. Here's why:

By adding certain options as standard, the production process would be simplified, because every vehicle would have them. Mercedes' productivity would improve, and better productivity equals lower prices.

Secondly, if every vehicle had the options, the price for the parts would go down. Anytime something is purchased in bulk, the price goes down, due mainly to increased productivity on the supply end.

And finally, the S-Class would transform itself into a rolling advertisement. Let's say for example that I had never seen a new S-Class before, but my best friend just happened to purchase one and come pick me up for a round of golf. Although I might be impressed by a standard S-Class without any extra options, I'd be much more impressed if he showed me an S-Class loaded with Night View Assist, Distronic PLUS, etc. Of course, the more impressed I am, the more likely I am to purchase a new S-Class of my own. This leads to more sales for Mercedes, which ultimately leads to better prices for consumers.

Do I think everyone would benefit from the above mentioned scenario? Absolutely. Do I think this will ever happen? Nope.

Not as long as there's teams of people hired to squeeze the price of the S-Class (and every other vehicle) down to a specific price point.

Sure, these options will eventually come standard, but when they do, there will be a host of other new and cutting-edge options that replace them, and the vicious cycle will repeat itself.

It's the way of the automotive world.
Alx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Old 03-06-2006, 01:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Shaolin Shadow Boxer
 
The Artist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden Gothenburg
Posts: 11,435
My Mood:
Thanks: 122
Thanked 721 Times in 452 Posts
The Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud ofThe Artist has much to be proud of
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

cool post.. i agree with almost everything he says..
some options need to be standard.. allthough very much is standard on a S class.. but the most popular.. non superexpensive options.. like distronic..should be standard..lets see what zetsche does..
The Artist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
Alx
007
 
Alx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -Poconos, PA.- 2005 Aston Martin DB9
Posts: 5,458
My Mood:
Thanks: 886
Thanked 551 Times in 224 Posts
Alx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to beholdAlx is a splendid one to behold
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

I think they will do it, and for the prices they charge it would help justify it. There is no reason for certain options to be options, they should be standards with the package.
Alx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 01:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
Fanatic
 
MikeJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oulu
Posts: 2,036
My Mood:
Thanks: 157
Thanked 528 Times in 298 Posts
MikeJ is a splendid one to beholdMikeJ is a splendid one to beholdMikeJ is a splendid one to beholdMikeJ is a splendid one to beholdMikeJ is a splendid one to beholdMikeJ is a splendid one to beholdMikeJ is a splendid one to behold
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

Let's see... the American S-Class buyer gets his car for less money than anyone else (for comparison, starting price here is $130,460 for an S320 CDI), and most likely with the highest standard equipment level as well. Yet, the complaint we see here is not altogether without reason.
(While the U.S. is most likely the largest market for S-Classes, it's not enough to warrant the fitment of all the toys to all the cars delivered in different markets, which would be required in order to simplify the process, right?)
The part about having those chrome things and whatever as yes/no options is spot on, and of course there are some things that should be standard on a top-end luxury car. However, there are those people who see all the fancy new things only as one more thing to go wrong or never bother to learn to use them anyway. As all the thingies add to the complexity of operating the vehicle, why should people who never wanted them in the first place be forced to deal with them? I'm technologically inclined, I can operate pretty much everything but when it comes to people like my parents that's not the case - mom wouldn't dare to touch them and dad wouldn't bother.
MikeJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 02:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
Contributor
 
Merc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora IL USA
Posts: 4,955
Thanks: 363
Thanked 672 Times in 346 Posts
Merc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud of
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

Not sure I agree here. There are some that don't want all the gee-whiz items and then there are those that do.

Then you look at some of the other options. Wood on the steering wheel - $900. Chrome door handle inserts - $79. Trunk handle - $19. Are you kidding me? I'm spending $85,000+ on Mercedes' flagship sedan, and I'm going to be charged $19 for a trunk handle?

Except for the wooden steering wheel, those are not "options" they are accesories. Big difference. Every single car maker in the world has a small to large accessory catalouge with all kinds of silly stuff like this. Mercedes shouldn't be singled out here.

That said I think Mercedes do better by including more standard equipment, but the truly fancy stuff should be left as options.

If we're going to talk about Mercedes' options, we can't leave out Porsche. Porsche has the largest options list in the world by far! You can get leather covered air vents in a Porsche is so desire. Many of their better paint colors are over 3K!

Then there is the issue of differing markets in which a car like the S-Class is sold. I think it would be hugely expensive for them to build in more options as standard only to have to strip them for certain markets.

I'd have to look at each Mercedes model and see what I think should be standard, obviously a long process...lol! The S-Class could use some more standard equipment, but not much IMO.

Lastly, the average person buying a 86K car isn't troubled by 10K in options. If 10K puts the car out of their reach they couldn't afford it in the first place.

M
Merc1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
Fanatic
 
Mr. Mercedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 96
Thanked 77 Times in 52 Posts
Mr. Mercedes will become famous soon enoughMr. Mercedes will become famous soon enough
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

The way Mercedes prices their cars is ludicrous. First of all the base price is quite often at least AUS $15,000 higher than the equivalent Audi, BMW or Lexus and then the prices on their options is unbelievable:

1. Distronic Pluc - AUS$7000
2. Entertainment Package - AUS $9500
3. Adaptive xenon headlights - AUS $4500
4. Decent Alloy wheels - AUS $4500

Its astounding that they can charge these prices for options when they are standard on a relatively lowly lexus IS250. Well BMW and Audi also suffer the options addiction like Benz, at least theirs are reasonably prices.

Also, you could easily add 30-40 G just adding some of the technological wonders that they rave on about. They should shut up about them, unless they plan to standardise them or make them reasonably priced. Its quite embarassing really that the flagship S-class would come with less standard equipment than say an IS or GS lexus. I'm so over MB's bullshit pricing strategy.

And it clearly is profiteering as far as I am concerned. If other car makers can manage to include these as standard, why does MB demand thousands of dollars more. Production costs are not that much higher!!! For example, according to Hella Germany, Xenon headlights cost about $150-200 dollars more per unit that regular headlamps. But then MB goes ahead and charges $4G plus for them.

Yes yes, buyers of these cars can afford to pay, but MANY MANY buyers of these cars are also not stupid and value for money IS important to them. Quite simply MB screw you for everything they can get out of you. It may work for them now, but sooner or later its going to catch up to them if they don't change their ways.
Mr. Mercedes is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 03:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
Contributor
 
Merc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora IL USA
Posts: 4,955
Thanks: 363
Thanked 672 Times in 346 Posts
Merc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud of
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

Here is the actual article:


- ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

I've always said (in the E-Class thread I think) that Mercedes needs to do a real sports package on their cars, not just the cosmetic AMG package. The best thing to do would be to combine the two, sportier suspension and the AMG styling enhancments like they have on the SLK this year in the U.S. The previous AMG package on the E-Class was way too expensive (like 5K) for just cosmetic enhancement. Now the E has a proper sports package.

I'm all for streamling production, but I still think a Mercedes should offer more in the way of options than other cars, especially on their high-end models. More standard equipment and leave the gee-whiz stuff as options is the way to do it. Look at what the market wants as standard and do it (if $$$ feasible), well at least some of the reasonable items. Everything can't be standard.

M
Merc1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 09:34 AM   #8 (permalink)
Contributor
 
cawimmer430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mühldorf am Inn, Germany
Posts: 6,249
Thanks: 2,362
Thanked 1,733 Times in 829 Posts
cawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

With respect to the Mercedes options stratgey, I agree it's a bit outdated. They're still practicing the technique which they did in the '70s and '80s. Times change and they should adapt, especially given what the competition does.

On the bright side however, there are now more standard things in Mercedes' cars like never before. Before the facelift, you still had to specify AIR-CONDITIONING on your W203 C-Class! The W168 A-Class had no standard electric windows or A/C, you had to order them. On the current W203 and W169 A-Classes, A/C is standard (thought the W169 A-Classes by default still comes with manual windows!). In that regard, MB has become a little more realistic.
cawimmer430 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 11:44 AM   #9 (permalink)
Philosopher
 
Yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,198
My Mood:
Thanks: 1,243
Thanked 1,229 Times in 701 Posts
Yannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant futureYannis has a brilliant future
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

The CEO of DC shouldn't compare Mercedes with Huyndai cause he is giving the wrong impression.
Yannis is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2006, 11:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
Contributor
 
Merc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora IL USA
Posts: 4,955
Thanks: 363
Thanked 672 Times in 346 Posts
Merc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud ofMerc1 has much to be proud of
Re: Mercedes To Reduce Options On Passenger Vehicles?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yannis
The CEO of DC shouldn't compare Mercedes with Huyndai cause he is giving the wrong impression.
Yeah I thought that too. He shouldn't have mentioned any other company in that sentence.

M
Merc1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Reply

Bookmarks
Search Cloud
2009 a4 cabriolet 2009 honda s2000 2009 hyundai tiburon 2010 audi a3 2010 rolls royce 350z hp a3 2010 adenauer mercedes adriana stoner adriana stoner photos adriana stoner pictures amx07 audi 2009 a4 audi a3 2010 audi a3 titanium audi a7 audi brand core values audi forum tokyo audi mmi interface cable audi mmi ipod audi q7 wallpaper audi q7 wallpapers b6 rs4 conversion bentley brunei bf 109 wallpaper bmw 5er f10 boeing 2707 boeing sst bombardier bike bombardier spyder buy iphone switzerland c clas cdi car photography tutorial cool shark photos cool shark pictures croatian chicks croatian girls croatian hot girls curbzone damien hirst's controversial skull dc-xz6 donald trump mansion donald trump's mansion female music artists follow me car future supercars gl63 gl63 amg grey goose rolls royce phantom hot croatian girl hot croatian girls hot croatians hyundai 2009 tiburon hyundai tiburon 2009 iphone 3g prepaid switzerland koenigsegg car configurator koenigsegg configurator madtv sketches mercedes mixte mmi ipod modified x5 monet motertrend new audi a3 2010 new slk 2009 nurburgring wallpapers price waleed q7 body kit richest f1 drivers rims configurator ruji wallpaper salma hayek video seat ibiza 2009 secret service suv secret service vehicles sl55 body kit slk 2009 spyder motercycle sr71 replacement stoner adriana sultan of brunei car sultan of brunei cars swallow chicken bone swallowed chicken bone the resolute desk top gayer top gear s5 traveler dc xz6 traveler dc-xz6 trump houses v!sa gmi+calibration+manual vectoring quattro system vepr commander versace aircraft volkswagen phaeton reliability vroom box waleed diamond mercedes what is eaten in one week www.curbzone.com z350 2005 for sale uae

Thread Tools