| |
| |||||||
| CLK-Class W209 Currently in Production (2004 - W208 Produced during (1998 - 2003) |
| Welcome to the Curb Zone. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view and access most features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,734
Thanks: 64
Thanked 88 Times in 59 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review Quote:
Now if AMG makes a sport model like they did with the SLK, that would be hella schweet. | |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,362
Thanks: 301
Thanked 468 Times in 240 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review any real car nut would have registered that I'm speaking of mechanical bits, such as the suspension which helped the CLK DTM become the best steering MB, ever. Could care less about the wings amongst many other things protruding out the body of the CLK DTM making their way to the CLK63, that's not what the CLK63 is for. ![]() |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,734
Thanks: 64
Thanked 88 Times in 59 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review Like I said before the CLK is a GT at heart adding a steering system like the one found in the DTM would give more information as far as were the wheels are pointed. At the same time it would make the drive more exhausting. Suspension, well, they have ABC which I think was never available for the 55, that should help it handle better without having to modify the rear to take the bespoked DTM subframe. |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,362
Thanks: 301
Thanked 468 Times in 240 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review Quote:
You're thworing in a bunch of numbers into an equation that doesn't event exsist. First off, there's no ABC in the CLK, or 63, the car is much too simple for such electronic trickery. Second, who said anything about a CLK DTM chassis bits??? We're only talking suspension geometery. A simple front and rear suspensin upgrade wouldn't require much a modification to the exsisting setup since it's relatively the same car to begin w/. | |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,362
Thanks: 301
Thanked 468 Times in 240 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review Jus went to the website> you're right I'm wrong. A pointless debate for me though, I really dont like this car, looks aside it has nothing to offer a hardcore driving enthusiast. The CLK63 AMG is the seal, the E92 M3 is the Great White that lies below its' all assuming victim. Munch. |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,573
Thanks: 51
Thanked 52 Times in 49 Posts
![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review I`m going to hold off my final judgements on the CLK63 until we get a road test of this car with some solid numbers. This is nothing more than a preview, Thay didn`t even give test numbers. Not a good way to make a final judgement imo. |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA
Posts: 4,955
Thanks: 363
Thanked 672 Times in 346 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review Autoweek has an article about the CLK63 and the new V8 and they say the CLK63 does not have ABC, but the AMG website says it does. Somwhere along the line the communication got messed up. M |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Aficionado ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,362
Thanks: 301
Thanked 468 Times in 240 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review I read the Autoweek review as well, then bum-man informed me that ABC is indeed a feature on the CLK63, went and checked the AMG site which verified bum's info. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) | |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bell CALIFORNIA
Posts: 608
Thanks: 29
Thanked 27 Times in 14 Posts
![]() | Re: EVO CLK63 AMG review Quote:
Now tell me what's not so hardcore driving enthusiast about this masterpiece ?? ![]() | |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| amg, clk63, evo, review |
| Search Cloud |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CNET review the S550! | BMW_Dude | S-Class | 2 | 05-02-2006 12:01 AM |
| Autoweek: Cayman review | Centurion | Cayman | 8 | 04-02-2006 11:32 AM |
| "The Truth About Cars" S550 Review | NevadaJack | S-Class | 2 | 03-19-2006 10:41 PM |
| BMW M6 vs. Mercedes CLK63 AMG | Splenditenes | Internal Combustion | 32 | 02-21-2006 02:48 AM |
| Mercedes S-Class Review Roundup | Alx | S-Class | 16 | 12-14-2005 05:43 PM |