| |
| |||||||
| CLK-Class W209 Currently in Production (2004 - W208 Produced during (1998 - 2003) |
| Welcome to the Curb Zone. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view and access most features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #42 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,573
Thanks: 51
Thanked 52 Times in 49 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? I think the CLK63 will really be a surprise performer!! I just checked the performance stats of the CLK55, remember the CLK55 used 367hp and 376lb-ft of torque with the 5-Speed tranny. It`s 0-60 time was *4.7sec. 0-100 in 11.3sec. *Car&Driver. article: - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER Now just think the CLK63 adds 114 more hp (481hp) and 89more lb-ft of torque! (465lb-ft) combine that to the AMG modified G7 and you might have a 0-60 time of 4.1seconds!! 0-100mph might be 9.0seconds flat! It just might be faster than the M6! M6 has a 0-60 time of 4.5sec. 0-100mph on 9.7sec. Remember the CLK63 is 6% more powerful than the BMW M6! M6 speed times. article: - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) |
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? This is Sportauto times: M5: 0-100km/h in 4.5 sec, 0-200km/h in 13,8 sec SL55: 0-100km/h in 4.3 sec, 0-200km/h in 13,8 sec CL65: 0-100km/h in 4.8 sec, 0-200km/h in 13,8 sec M6: 0-100km/h in 4.2 sec, 0-200km/h in 12,8 sec SL65: 0-100km/h in 4.3 sec, 0-200km/h in 13,1 sec It all depend on which carmag you take the numbers from. We can guess forever but we will first know when we see the CLK63 being tested. MB fans think MB CLK63 is faster car and BMW fans think M6 is a faster car. Same old same old ![]() |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,573
Thanks: 51
Thanked 52 Times in 49 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? I found these from MoterTrend, CL65 vs./ M5 0-60mph 3.8sec. vs./ 0-60mph4.4sec 0-100mph 8.5sec. vs./ 0-100mph. 10.2sec. 60-0 brakes 115ft/ 114ft Not bad for the CL65! ![]() Btw those were my estimated numbers for the CLK63. |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) |
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Lets say we take the numbers for M6, 0-200km/h in 12,8 sec the time Sportauto got. What do you estimate the CLK63 will do 0-200km/h in? BTW what the headline really should be is: CLK63 to eat CLS63???? ![]() |
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) | |
| Devotee ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,573
Thanks: 51
Thanked 52 Times in 49 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
Hmmm, to me thats a big mathmatical problem because I don`t do the math base off that speed time. I can`t tell you this, I believe the CLK63`s performance numbers will match the CLS55`s up to 100mph and might better it after 100mph due to the new 7-speed. Last edited by Splenditenes; 03-06-2006 at 02:37 PM.. | |
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) | |
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) | |
| Devotee ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 2,573
Thanks: 51
Thanked 52 Times in 49 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
I just added more text to my previous post. My net service is giving me problems today. Too damn slow. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #49 (permalink) | |
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
Come one GTA I wont be mad if your guess isnt 100% accurate. Do you guess 13.5, 12.5, 12.0, 11.5 or 10.0 seconds? Take a wild guess dude ![]() | |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) | |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bell CALIFORNIA
Posts: 608
Thanks: 29
Thanked 27 Times in 14 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
Can I guess ??? Id say in the high 12s (12.6,12.8) BTW , the CLK 63 will beat the CLS55 all the way , where does this beating change ? Against the CLS 63 / You guys cannot underestimate the new 6.3 AMG , the engine is completely AMG , and most of its tech comes originally from AMG's DTM garage and knowledge , the engine and the modified 7gtronic will give you Z06 performance , I am very sure about what Im saying because the car has power at every single point from 0-200mph . | |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |