| |
| |||||||
| CLK-Class W209 Currently in Production (2004 - W208 Produced during (1998 - 2003) |
| Welcome to the Curb Zone. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view and access most features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) | |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,413
Thanks: 31
Thanked 93 Times in 53 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
| |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Contributor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Aurora IL USA
Posts: 4,955
Thanks: 363
Thanked 672 Times in 346 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Yeah I like the idea of a V10 in a car like the M models from BMW. A V12 would be too heavy I think a M5/6. Now in a M7.......... M |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) | |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,734
Thanks: 64
Thanked 88 Times in 59 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? if CLK63 is faster than M6 in straightline then its faster than E63/CLS63 as well. I doubt AMG is making CLK63 faster than those. The driving experience will be sportier and the car more fun to drive. Also it will beat a CLS63 around a track but loose in acceleration. PS, I sat in the CLK63 yesterday and the interior quality isnt as nice as I thought it would be, some details details looks cheap but the design from the outside is beautiful. |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | ||
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bell CALIFORNIA
Posts: 608
Thanks: 29
Thanked 27 Times in 14 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) | ||
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) | |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bell CALIFORNIA
Posts: 608
Thanks: 29
Thanked 27 Times in 14 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
Yes Just_Me , it's not perfect I know . But the quality is good and the it doesnt look cheap , that's what I meant . | |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) | |
| Expert Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 12,612
Thanks: 741
Thanked 2,035 Times in 1,028 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) | |
| Advocate ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 624
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
I severly doubt the M Division will go onto turbo'ing their engines. Anyway. Overall, no, the CLK63 AMG will not 'eat' the M6, but I sure as heck know that I'd take a CLK over an M6. | |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |