| |
| |||||||
| CLK-Class W209 Currently in Production (2004 - W208 Produced during (1998 - 2003) |
| Welcome to the Curb Zone. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view and access most features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #101 (permalink) |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 32 Times in 19 Posts
![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? I'm sure the CLK63 might be a killer, but I hope the next Generation is more aggressive. Give the whole car line up an S-class make over (except the outstanding and drop dead beauty known as the CLS). |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |
| | #104 (permalink) |
| Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 320
Thanks: 40
Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? CLK63 is a big disappointment in my book. Look at this autoexpress test: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/au...st_drives.html. One of the slowest cars around the track despite all that power. Way slower than a 335 on run flats, even slower than a Mazda 6 . If that is not one crappy handling car, not sure what is. Last edited by Sunny; 10-06-2006 at 05:28 PM. |
| | |
| | #105 (permalink) | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,889
Thanks: 248
Thanked 150 Times in 113 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: CLK63 to eat M6???? Quote:
And I just now found out about the monstrous power/torque advantage over the 335i, and it also P Zero (Rosas I belive) tyres. I tought the 63 had way less power/torque. | |
| | |
|
Advertisement
| Sponsored links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |