Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yaz AMG Good review Chris 
I for one like the design of the R-Class. I like its interior a little better than the ML's too. I agree with you that it's a a family-oriented car and I think an R500 is the way to go when choosing this type of vehicle. After seeing the R63 AMG in real life, I don't think it's pointless, and I kind of liked it more than the ML63. It will be one of a kind  |
Thanks. I'm not interested in the R500 really, too thirsty and the '320 CDI will give you enough realistic performance for everyday driving. Maybe in America, the R500 is the way to go, but in Europe, the R320 CDI and R350 will hands down be the bestsellers.
No offense, but to me, the R63 AMG and the ML63 AMG are some of the most pointless cars out there. Autobild tested the ML63 AMG and said it was totoally incapable of going offroad anymore. Why would you buy a high performance SUV when it can't even go offroad? I know many SUV buyers don't take their SUV offroad, but I would. And I also would never get an ML500 or ML63 AMG simply because the fuel economy is so piss poor...