View Single Post
Old 10-09-2006, 03:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
cawimmer430
Contributor
 
cawimmer430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mühldorf am Inn, Germany
Posts: 6,256
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 1,754 Times in 835 Posts
cawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond reputecawimmer430 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jeremy Clarkson Reviews the E63 AMG

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7.3 AMG
Actually the E63 gave the E-Class much better flexibilty then it ever had, the supercharged 5.4 litre V8 used to lag behind, the 6.2 is much better in terms of in-time. But the E63 doesn't look like it's lagging behind in the numbers you provided..?, it's .5 quicker from 60 to 100 km/h and just .2 slower from 80-120 km/h.
The engine response should be better too now that it is naturally aspirated.
cawimmer430 is offline   Reply With Quote